Housing and homelessness projects
Homelessness amongst minority ethnic populations
People from minority ethnic backgrounds are nearly three times more likely to become statutorily homeless than are white people. The ODPM (now CLG) commissioned ETHNOS to find out why, so that better prevention measures can be developed.
ETHNOS provided the commissioners with a thorough understanding of the causes of homelessness among minority ethnic communities. This was based on a comprehensive literature review of the causes of homelessness in the minority ethnic communities, and a major empirical research which involved 155 interviews with minority ethnic homeless households, local authority service providers, and voluntary and charitable organisations working with homeless households.
The communities covered by the research are black Caribbeans, Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, black Africans, Irish people and refugees. For each community, the research report highlights:
• the main causes of homelessness
• their knowledge of the statutory homelessness services
• their pathways through services
• their experiences of statutory homelessness services
The research report also describes in detail the working cultures of local authority services and their impact on provisions and services for ethnic minority households that are homeless or at risk of homelessness.
Good practice guidance derived from the research provides local authorities guidance on:
• designing a homelessness strategy that takes account of the needs of people from minority
ethnic backgrounds
• making mainstream services more culturally sensitive
• developing specialist services for minority ethnic communities
• preventing homelessness amongst minority ethnic communities
• tackling racial harassment
• providing temporary and permanent accommodation for minority ethnic homeless people
• providing culturally-sensitive support to minority ethnic households
Equality Impact Assessment on the London Housing Strategy
Housing in London is a critical issue. The London Housing Board tasked the Greater London Authority with carrying out an Equality Impact Assessment on the draft London Housing Strategy – the document which sets out the future of housing for the whole of London for the next decade. Because of the importance of housing and of the number of people it affects, it was crucial to get things right. So the GLA commissioned ETHNOS to find out about the anticipated impact of the Strategy on the following target equality groups: people from black and minority ethnic backgrounds, Gypsies and Travellers, asylum seekers and refugees, people from different faith groups, disabled people, women, children and young people, older people, and lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered (LGBT) people.
We combined a tailor-made EQIA questionnaire and focus groups with experts on both housing and the specific communities targeted. The results from the EQIA have fundamentally shaped the future of housing in London.
London Housing Advice Strategy
The GLA wished to produce a Housing Advice Strategy to ensure that timely, high-quality housing advice and assistance would be accessible to all people in housing need and to help them resolve their housing problems well before the situation reaches crisis point and people become homeless.
To ensure that people from ethnic minority backgrounds have access to high-quality housing advice and assistance – which is crucial given that they are almost three times more likely to become homeless than White people - the GLA asked ETHNOS to consult minority ethnic voluntary and community organisations on their views of the draft London Housing Advice Strategy. The aims of the consultation were:
• to assess the views of the black and minorityt ethnic sector on the Housing Advice Strategy
• to get a better understanding of how to engage the black and minority ethnic sector in the
development and delivery of high-quality housing advice services
• to test the feasibility of carrying out action research and/or capacity-building work with
these organisations in the future, with a particular focus on preventing homelessness
amongst black and minority ethnic communities
The final report informed the GLA’s London Housing Advice Strategy and ensured that it covered issues of relevance to ethnic minority households who are in housing needs, homeless or at risk of homelessness.
The drivers of Black and Asian people's perceptions of racial discrimination by public services
Modern, fair and effective public services are not possible if significant sections of the population perceive them as discriminatory. To better understand why some people perceive certain public services to be discriminatory, CLG commissioned ETHNOS to conduct a detailed qualitative study of key drivers of perceptions of racial discrimination in eight public services: council housing departments and housing associations, local schools, local doctors’ surgeries, the police service, the prison service, the courts, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and the probation service.
The research combined two qualitative methods: semi-structured face-to-face individual interviews and vignettes representing scenarios specifically designed to be ambiguous about whether or not they depicted situations in which racial discrimination was displayed. One hundred and twenty (120) people from Asian and black backgrounds in England and Wales were interviewed.
The study identified that perceptions of racial discrimination were linked to various psychosocial factors - people’s self-concept, view of the world, understanding of racial discrimination, sensitivity to racial discrimination, and the sources and types of knowledge on which they base their perceptions – as well as to a wide range of factors specific to individual public services.
The report led to a range of recommendations that pertain to: greater involvement and consultation of minority ethnic communities; greater diversity of the workforce; greater professionalism amongst service providers and access to diversity and equality training; improvements in customer service; greater transparency of decision-making; better communications and explanations about procedure and decisions; systematic monitoring and evaluation of public services and evidence of progress; and greater accountability, access to complaints procedures, possibility of redress and tougher sanctions against racial discrimination.
You are viewing the text version of this site.
To view the full version please install the Adobe Flash Player and ensure your web browser has JavaScript enabled.
Need help? check the requirements page.